BY Ian Dunn | December 15 2011 | comments icon 1 COMMENT     print icon print

17-ROSEANNA-CUNNINGHAM

No consensus on anti-bigotry bill

Opposition parties unite to condemn the SNP’s actions after the Scottish Government passes The Offensive Behaviour at Football and Threatening Communications Bill

The SNP used its majority at Holyrood to pass The Offensive Behaviour at Football and Threatening Communications Bill yesterday, over the objections of all the opposition parties.

Under the new law will two new offences will be created targeting sectarian behaviour in and around football matches and on the internet. Those convicted under the new lawcould spend as long as five years in jail.

Community Safety Minister Roseanna Cunningham said that the bill was designed to help the 91 per cent of ‘decent, law-abiding’ Scots who had had enough of sectarian behaviour.

“This simple point seems to have been lost in what I think is a fog of denial and sometimes apparently wilful misunderstanding,” she said. “These are clear and specific improvements to the existing law.”

Opposition condemnation

After the bill was passed Labour, Conservatives, Liberal Democrats, Greens and Independent MSP Margo MacDonald issued a joint statement condemning the SNP’s actions.

“Members of all political parties are determined to wipe the blight of sectarianism from Scottish society. It is of real regret that the first piece of legislation passed by this new Parliament has been railroaded through by the SNP,” it said. “The SNP has used its majority to force through bad law that risks doing more harm than good. It sets a worrying precedent for this Parliament.”

The only amendment to the legislation accepted by the SNP came from Patrick Harvie of the Green Party pledging the Government to consult with other parties as part of the review of how the new legislation would work in practice.

Labour justice spokesman James Kelly was particularly critical of Roseanna Cunningham’s handling of the legislation.

“We all know that throughout this process, it has not been competently handled by the minister,” he said. “What we need is a properly thought-out strategy on sectarianism, one that is informed by real people, not civil servants in St Andrew’s House.”

Church position

Before the bill was passed Catholic Church representatives said they had told the government that the bill is but the starting point in finally bringing anti-Catholicism in Scotland to an end.

Peter Kearney, director of the Scottish Catholic Media Office, said the Scottish Government had still to commit to tackling the root causes of the problem.

“For all the talk about football, or Catholic schools or even Irish migration, John Ogilive was killed in Glasgow for being a Catholic long before any of those things,” he said. “There is a deep seated animosity to Catholicism that has its roots deep in the past and what Scotland needs to do is have a serious conversation about its religious history, which is violent and tumultuous. But until that happens we are merely looking at the symptoms of the problems rather than homing in on the cause.”

John Deighan, the Scottish Bishops’ parliamentary officer, said that there also needs to be a change in the way society sees people of faith.

“There needs to a recognition that religion is a civilising factor in life and this is why we have been pushing for a charter of religious freedom,” he said.

Free speech

The Christian Institute has welcomed the late addition of a free speech clause to the legislation, but expressed concerns about the Government’s ability to amend the legislation in future.

“We are absolutely delighted that the Scottish Government has moved to protect freedom of speech and religion from its anti-sectarianism legislation,” Colin Hart, director of The Christian Institute, said. “This follows a huge letter writing campaign.

“However, we remain concerned that Ministers have awarded themselves the ability to add additional grounds to the religious hatred offence at a later date.”

[email protected]

Comments - One Response

  1. RolftheGanger says:

    Re the last sentence: Failing to make provision for ways to amend legislation has, in the past, allowed ingenious ruffians to circumvent laws on techicalities; of specific wording of an Act for example. This has allowed crimes to go unpunished until laws are amended, sometimes decades later or not at all. Any such amendments would still need just cause and public support.

Leave a Reply

previous lead stories

Reports of a ‘ban’ on eulogies at funerals are misleading, bishop says

April 12th, 2019 | comments icon 0 COMMENTS

Bishop rejects secular characterisation of advisory letter to priests...


Every Scottish political party supports Pope’s condemnation of ‘hypocritical’ arms-dealing countries

April 5th, 2019 | comments icon 0 COMMENTS

MSPs from every parliamentary party back Pope Francis' comments as...


Catholic schools serve poorer areas yet are more likely to hit exam targets

March 29th, 2019 | comments icon 0 COMMENTS

New figures show Catholic schools are more likely to educate...


‘Save us from fatwa death sentence’

March 22nd, 2019 | comments icon 0 COMMENTS

Glasgow parish rallies round Catholic family who face threat of...




Social media

Latest edition

P1-APR-19-2019

exclusively in the paper

  • Parish refurb set to ‘light up Bishopbriggs’
  • Help boost pro-life vigil as Easter approaches
  • A moveable feast built upon a rock, By Gerald Warner
  • Hugh Dougherty explores how we can fill the pews on a Sunday
  • In the last of his Saintly Journeys through Lent series, Dr Harry Schnitker looks at the saints who have shown us the way of contrition

Previous editions

Previous editions of the Scottish Catholic Observer newspaper are only available to subscribed Members. To download previous editions of the paper, please subscribe.

note: registered members only.

Read the SCO